Roee Kalinsky's RV-7A Project

Stick Grips
Home Up News Specifications

 

Back Up Next

Stick Grips

Running Total Hours: 0.0

 

2008.03.15: (0.0) I selected the military-style stick grips made by Infinity Aerospace.  The design of these grips is closely modeled after those found in many 3rd generation American jet fighters, such as the F-4 Phantom II.  They are contoured to fit the shape of the hand, and have a number of switches strategically mounted for easy access right on the grip.  The idea is that the pilot can access various functions without having to look down into the cockpit or fumble to reach for switches on the instrument panel.  The military term for this concept is HOTAS: Hands On Throttle And Stick.  Makes good sense.  The main differences between the Infinity grips and their military cousins are:

1. The Infinity grips are scaled down slightly compared to the military grips, to be more comfortable for an average human's hand, and not wearing gloves.
2. The Infinity grips are available in a right-handed version (like the military grips) and also a left-handed version that's a mirror image.  The left-handed grip is better suited for the left seat of a side-by-side airplane with a center throttle, like the RV-7A.  Mine will have a lefty on the left and a righty on the right.
3. The Infinity grips, while certainly not cheap (about $175 each), are a lot cheaper than the genuine military grips.  They also use standard switches in commonly available form factors instead of exotic and expensive mil-spec varieties.

Infinity Aerospace, incidentally, is a local company based at Gillespie Field.  And the man behind the company is J.D. Newman, a retired U.S. Navy F-14 pilot.  When I came by his hangar to pick up my grips, he showed me his own airplane project, retractable landing gear hardware that he designs and sells, and other projects he has in the works.  Cool stuff!

2008.04.10: (0.0) Started fitting the grips to my stick tubes.

First it should be noted that the left and right sticks on the RV-7A are not the same.  The left hand stick is a single welded assembly that is non-removable, with a stick tube that is 1" outer diameter, and approx 0.035" wall thickness (measured).  The right hand stick is in two pieces: a base and a removable stick tube.  The stick tube itself is 7/8" outer diameter, and apporx 0.050" wall thickness (measured).  The Infinity grips are designed to fit over a 1" diameter tube, so the left stick is good as is.  For the right stick, I bought a spacer that Infinity sells for exactly this purpose.

Stick length in the RV's is a contentious issue.  In RV-6 and -8 series aircraft, there are interference issues between the sticks and the panel and/or other structures in the cockpit, and therefore builders are often forced to shorten the sticks to remove the interference.  In the RV-7 series there is no interference issue.  Still, many -7 pilots report that they prefer the control feel and ergonomics of a shorter stick to the stock length.  Van's strongly discourages this practice (see articles in the RV'ator), noting the effects on control sensitivity and stick forces.  I decided to act conservatively and keep essentially the stock length.  I can always slide my hand down the stick below the grip, as some do, at appropriate phases of flight.  And if at a later date I do decide to shorten the sticks, that's always an option.

Having said all that, I did have to shorten the stick tubes in order to keep the same effective stick length once the grips are mounted.  The Infinity grips are designed to slip over only 2.125" of the tube, and there is another approximately 2.875" from there to the top of the hand in its natural position.  I decided somewhat arbitrarily that the natural hand position on the bare stick tube would be with the top of the hand at 0.5" below the top of the tube.  So to maintain the equivalent hand position with the grips, I had to shorten the tubes by 3.375".  Note also that the left and right stick tubes weren't exactly the same length to begin with (other builders have reported the same).  The left stick was about 0.5" longer than the right stick.  This difference isn't meaningful, but rather just falls within Van's generally loose design and manufacturing tolerances.  Anyway, I took the average of the two as the nominal length, and so I trimmed the left stick tube by 3.625" and the right stick tube by 3.125" to achieve approximately the same nominal stick length on both sides.

The top of the stick tube then needs to have two 29/64" holes on the left and right sides, 0.5" from the top, to receive a lug on the inside of the grip that keeps it from rotating or sliding up the tube.  And a 0.5" wide notch on the aft side, from the top down 1.25", to provide a channel for the 17-conductor cable.  But per J.D.'s advice, and that of other builders, the ideal orientation of the grip is not at right angles, but rather rotated somewhat so that it is more in line with the forearm.  This way, there is less or no bending in the wrist (at least in the neutral position), making it more comfortable.  I'll want to just sit in the airplane and play with it to find the most comfortable angle for me.  So for now I've only cut the holes and notch in the right side stick tube, which is free to rotate until I drill the hole for the bolt that secures it to the bottom piece.  I'll use the right side stick to do this because with the left hand stick, being non-removable, there is no such freedom.

2008.04.14: (0.0) Stick grip orientation.

I installed the right side stick in the airplane, installed the seat floors, and dropped in a makeshift seat cushion (a folded up furniture blanket).  I set a ladder next to the airplane and -- for the first time ever -- climbed into the cockpit.  Playing with the stick a little bit (and really enjoying it!) I found that 1) indeed it is uncomfotable with the grip oriented straight ahead, and 2) the most comfortable orientation for me was with the grip rotated about 22.5° counter-clock-wise, putting it more-or-less inline with my forearm.

Armed with this information I went ahead and cut the notch and mounting holes in the left hand stick, orienting the grip at 22.5° clock-wise.  I also then drilled the bolt hole that secures the right side stick tube (F-669) to the base (WD-611), orienting the right side stick at 22.5° counter-clock-wise.

Note that the bolt securing the right side stick tube to the base is not in the original plans.  It is specified in Van's service bulletin SB 07-2-6, which was issued as a result of -- you guessed it -- an accident caused by the stick tube popping out of its base during a landing.  Now, one might say having some means of securing the stick to its base would seem like common sense.  I for one would agree.  But apparently it didn't occur to Van's, and to at least one builder [and probably many more], until the inevitable actually occurred.  This example illustrates why I will continue to fix potential problems as I find them, despite Van's and many in the builders' community insisting that "it's never been a problem for me, so don't worry about it."

2008.09.01: (0.0) I started examining my options for routing the cables from the sticks toward the panel, and quickly realized that this will not be a trivial task.  The problem is that the cable is so thick and inflexible that it is almost impossible to have it transition from the stick to an unmoving part of the airframe without it either putting noticeable forces on the stick, or having excessive free-floating cable that would chafe or potentially interfere with other moving parts associated with the flight controls.

I experimented with various ideas by zip-tying a length of cable to the stick and playing with the cable routing.  The most promising approach was actually to have the cable exit the stick on the forward side, part way up, and be secured with zip ties down the stick until it becomes free near the axis of rotation, but oriented straight down.  From there it loops around and is then secured to the torque tube, following it inboard.  Then, it makes another transition from the torque tube to an unmoving part of the airframe.  The advantage of this approach is that instead of making one transition with two axes of freedom, it makes two separate transitions each with only one axis of freedom.  Each is therefore geometrically simpler, can be accomplished in smaller space, and can more easily be accomplished without imposing noticeable forces on the stick.  The disadvanted however is that this routes the cables right through the heart of the flight controls area, and if the cable came loose somehow (zip ties break, etc.) it could potentially jam up the controls.


As an alternative, I am now considering puting active electronics in the stick tube itself to scan the switches and transmit serial data back to the panel.  That would relieve me from having to route that humangous cable around the cockpit, and instead I'll only have to deal with a much smaller and more flexible 3-conductor cable (power, ground, serial data) instead.  It also relieves me from having to drill a very big exit hole for the cable in the wall of the tube, which makes me somewhat uneasy, structurally speaking.  We'll see, I'll put this aside for now.

2009.03.03: (0.0) Lots of activity over the last few weeks, but I'll just summarize.  I decided to go with the serializer idea, and I've got it built.  I won't go into too much technical detail here, but basically I designed and built a serializer board as I described previously.  It scans the switches and transmits their state over RS-232 at a rate of appox 300 samples/s.  The physical dimensions of the board are approx 4" L × 0.75" W, and I enclosed the whole thing in heat-shrink tubing for added protection.  It nestles nicely inside the stick tubes.


Out the bottom comes a 3-conductor 24 AWG shielded cable to a 4-pin M8-size AMP/Tyco Miniature Circular Plastic Connector ("Miniature CPC"), making the stick easily removable from the fuselage.  The pinout of the connector is as follows:
Connector pin Cable conductor Board J2 pin Description
1 1 (white) 1 Power (operating voltage +4V to +60V)
2 2 (white/blue) 2 Serial data (RS-232)
3 3 (white/orange) 3 Ground
4 shield n/a Shield (should be grounded at main board)



Ultimately the stickgrip serializer cables will connect to a main board in the forward cockpit that will receive the switch states as well as other airframe sensor inputs, and will control the various airframe actuators: flaps, trim, fuel pump, lighting, and interface to avionics.  For now, I just made  a little adapter cable and test program so I can plug the stick grips into a PC to test them.  All looks good.

Just a few details about the board design process:

CAD Tools: I used the open source gEDA tool suite on Linux to create the schematics and board layout.  This is the first time I've used the gEDA package, and I found it to be a mixed bag.  Compared to the commercially available tools I've used before (OrCAD, Pads, etc.), the gEDA tools are definitely less user-friendly and more rough around the edges.  But after a bit of a steep learning curve, I actually found them quite useable, at least for a simple design like this.  One big upside to the gEDA tools is that their design files are all just formatted ASCII.  This facilitates creation of my own helper scripts, which I did, and also makes it possible to diff two versions of a design file.  I'm a big proponent of that!

Board FAB: I used www.4pcb.com to fab the boards.  Good prices at prototype quantities, good manufacturing quality, automated DFM checker for gerbers uploaded to their website, and a quick turnaround, delivered as promised.  This was my first time using them, and I would use them again.

Board assembly: Did this myself.  I currently don't have easy access to professional assembly/rework lab, so I set up a basic lab at home.  No microscope... but thankfully I have good eye sight and was able to solder the fine-pitched parts without too much difficulty.

2008.04.16: (0.0) Fitted the stick grips into the fuselage, which meant mounting a mating connector into the seat ribs and then adjusting the stick grip's cable to provide the desireable routing and freedom of motion.  I then zip-tied the cable to holes I had drilled in the stick to provide strain relief and hold the cable at the correct position.

 

Back Up Next

 

 

Send mail to roee@kalinskyconsulting.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2003 Roee Kalinsky
Last modified: April 18, 2009

Visit my consulting web site at www.kalinskyconsulting.com for your engineering needs.